Theories of Post-Coloniality: Edward W. Said and W.B. Yeats :: Essays Papers

Theories of Post-Coloniality Edward W. Said and W.B. Yeats(Citations from Saids essay Yeats and Decolonization as published by Bay Press, not the Field Day pamphlet)Post-compound theory, a mode of thought which accepts European Imperialism as a historical accompaniment and attempts to address nations touched by colonial enterprises, has as yet failed to adequately consider Ireland as a post-colonial nation. Undoubtedly, Ireland is a post-colonial nation (where post-colonial refers to either consequence of colonial contact) with a body of literary belong that may be read productively as post-colonial.Although colonialism, as a area for Irish criticism and theory, has been tentatively broached (for example, see Celtic Revivals (1985) by Seamus Deane) Edward Saids lecture Yeats and Decolonization, published as a pamphlet by Field Day in 1988, was an important catalyst for post-colonial field of battle of Irish literature and culture. The premise of this now seminal study is that Yeats was a poet of decolonisation, a muse expressing the Irish experience of the dominant colonial power of Britain. Rather than reading Yeatss poetry from the conventional stance of high European modernism Said explains that he appears to me, and I am sure many others in the Third World, to belong natur each(prenominal)y to the other cultural domain (3).Using this as his point of departure, Said enters into a line of argument which claims that Yeats was a central figure in debating and insist an overt drive towards the construction of a national Irish personal identity as a vital act of decolonisation. Further, Said places Yeats within a world(a) framework of anti-Imperialism, drawing parallels between the Irish poet and Third dry land writers and theorists such as Fanon, Neruda and Achebe. Though an incredibly influential essay, the reverberations of which may salvage be felt in Inventing Ireland and other texts, it is also a work that demands close analysis and is replete w ith short-sighted and ill-informed ideas.Said locates Ireland among territories like India, South America, Africa and Malaysia as a site of colonial contention. In doing so he emphasises Irelands role, and thus Irish literature, in colonial history as a member of the peripheral (from a Eurocentric viewpoint) Third World. According to this grind to a halt dwellers are paralleled as the Irish counterpart to innumerable niggers, .... babus and wogs (6). Yet, this argument, in retrospect, does not hold.Denis Donoghue (Confusion in Irish Studies) has explicitly condemned post-colonial theory for adopting a global paradigm of colonial experience as a discourse which treats all Empires as homogenous.