Friday, February 22, 2019
Ethical System Table
Directions 1. Fill in brief definitions of to severally iodin primary ethical theory. 2. Identify alternate names or variations of each ethical system based on your reading of the text and secondary materials. Match the real-world examples listed below with the corresponding systems. The first one has been completed for you in the t fit. a. I commit the great unwashed should be adequate to eat lynchpin if they like the taste of it. b. I believe that if mother wit is going to be eaten, it should be available for everyone to eat. c. I believe people should be able to eat sand because it is the right thing to do. . I believe people should be able to eat sand because it is unassailable for ones health. e. I believe people should be able to eat sand if they decide they want to, regardless of whether it is someone elses sand. f. I believe people should be able to eat sand if they want to because they argon free to make the purpose themselves. g. I believe I leave behind eat san d because it is the standard meal for my community. 3. Develop your give birth study example that fits with each system. Present each workplace scenario in a substantial paragraph of approximately 40 words.Although the table field depart expand to accommodate your workplace examples, you whitethorn list them at the goal of the table make a note in the table to escort the attached examples, however, so your facilitator knows to look for scenarios below the table. 4. Format references according to APA standards and implicate them after the table. Ethical Theory or Brief Definition former(a) Names for Theory Real-world ExampleWorkplace Example System Duty-based cleanity Regardless of consequences, Deontology, pluralism, C It is my duty to follow through with certain moral principles are moral rights, rights-basedI believe people instructions my oldtimer gives me, even if I binding, focusing on duty rather should be able to do not agree with the concept.It is my tha n results or moral pact Categorical imperative eat sand because moral obligation to delight in authority over what the unmarried would it is the right figures. prefer to do (Trevino & Nelson, specious rule thing to do. 2007, Ch. 4). In ethical motive, deontological ethics, or deontology (Greek deon meaning obligation or duty), is a theory holding that decisions should be made solely or primarily by considering ones duties and the rights of others.Some systems are based on biblical or tenets from sacred. Consequence-based an ethical decision should Consequentialist Theories B ethics maximize benefits to confederation and I believe that if I know that we signed a ignore for a big minimize harms.What matters is Utilitarianism sand is going to new customer but we cant announce it until the net balance of good be eaten, it next month. The benefits to morale of the consequences over bad (Trevino & should be bo n ton and employees outweigh the Nelson, 2007, Ch. 4). available for consequences of making an early everyone to eat. announcement. I should make the announcement. Rights-based Ethics Rights are considered to be Contractarianism A ethically correct and valid since companionable Contract I believe people Employees have the right to tarry a safe a large or ruling tribe should be able to working environment since that is part of endorses them (Ridley, 1998). eat sand if they the social contract in modern America. like the taste of it. tender-hearted Nature Ethics Ethical values that are hard coded D into people as being part of the Common Courtesy I believe people A co-worker has the need to switch shifts serviceman race. Natural tendencies should be able to to care for a sick family member. If the sooner of man-made law for making eat sand because other individual doesnt have a pressing decisions. it is good for engagement it would be ni ce to switch the ones health. shift and help them out. relativistic Ethics Moral disagreements are caused by Moral Relativism F the detail that everyone in theory I believe people Based on the position someone has in a is right in their own way. When in Rome, do as the should be able to company it may not be appropriate for them Individuals only have to be legitimate Romans do. eat sand if they to have visible piercings or tattoos when to themselves and no one else. want to because a more professional demeanor needs to be they are free to maintained. Others may be able to since it make the decision doesnt affect their performance or the themselves. company image in their position. Entitlement-based E Ethics I believe people should be able to eat sand if they decide they want to, regardless of whether it is someone elses sand. Virtue-based ethics The virtue ethics approach focusesCommunity ethics, G The shade control team in our company more on the integrity of the moralprofessional I believe I will has to utter nourishment handlers and safety actor than on the moral act responsibility eat sand because cards. I should be able to trust that food itself.In virtue ethics, The Disclosure Rule it is the standardprovided as model meets the standards of character is very much defined by meal for my the guidelines that they authentic when ones community (Trevino & Nelson, community. getting that certification. 2007, Ch. 4). Reference Trevino, L. K. , & Nelson, K. A. (2007). Managing business ethics Straight talk about how to do it right (4th ed. ). Hoboken, NJ Wiley. Ridley, Aaron. (1998). offset printing Bioethics. New York St. Martins Press.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.